Comments & Votes for this poll

Displaying 1-72 of 72 comments

• Flag

  Fred Cox voted yes on June 6, 2008

  

  Where can you find a $164,000 house? Not in the Bay Area!

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on June 6, 2008

  

  It may find you a wife!

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on June 6, 2008

  

  A house never got me laid. This will...

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on June 6, 2008

  

  Ummm, no.

• Flag

  Anonymous commented on June 6, 2008

  

  You are not very smart, speedracer.

• Flag

  Anonymous commented on June 6, 2008

  

  Of course you should!!!

• Flag

  Anonymous commented on June 6, 2008

  

  Negative.

• Flag

  Anonymous commented on June 6, 2008

  

  Positively! Ignore these fools.

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on June 6, 2008

  

  I would avoid blowing your wad on this monstrosity. Buy something sensible and save your money. You'll need it.

• Flag

  avarma voted yes on June 6, 2008

  

  live in it!

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on June 6, 2008

  

  hell yes

• Anonymous voted no on June 6, 2008

• Flag

  Jane voted no on June 7, 2008

  

  No Way! It looks like the old Kit from Knight Rider

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on June 10, 2008

  

  House is a better investment

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on June 10, 2008

  

  at least newly purchased house doesn't depreciate in value by 30%+, after you 'drive it off the lot'

• Anonymous voted no on June 11, 2008

• Flag

  pynipple voted no on June 11, 2008

  

  heck no, get a house ... if it wasn't your life savings then I would say GO FOR IT ... but now is THE best time in history to buy a house ... both prices and interest rates are super low and property is always a good investment as long as you can ride out times like this ... if you buy the right property now it could be worth double in just 5-10 years ... you won't see that kind of stable return on any other investment, plus you get to live in it while you're at it! ... if you can, buy TWO houses and rent the other one out and that might just pay the mortgage on both of them and then you can buy this DB9 at the same time :-)

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on June 11, 2008

  

  If you're dumb enough to ask this question, go for the car.

• Anonymous voted no on June 11, 2008

• Flag

  Sunny voted yes on June 11, 2008

  

  go 4 it!

• Flag

  sizzler voted no on June 11, 2008

  

  your life savings on a car? wowww

• Anonymous voted no on June 12, 2008

• Anonymous voted no on June 12, 2008

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on June 13, 2008

  

  idiotic

• Anonymous voted yes on June 13, 2008

• Anonymous voted no on June 13, 2008

• Anonymous voted yes on June 14, 2008

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on June 15, 2008

  

  no.

• Anonymous voted no on June 17, 2008

• Flag

  Anonymous commented on June 18, 2008

  

  Nope!

• Anonymous voted yes on June 18, 2008

• Anonymous voted yes on June 23, 2008

• Anonymous voted no on June 25, 2008

• Anonymous voted no on June 28, 2008

• Flag

  Kelfermookie voted no on July 4, 2008

  

  Of course not.That would be retarted of you to spend your life savings on a car.

• Anonymous voted yes on July 16, 2008

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on July 24, 2008

  

  30% of life savings? You've got to be kidding. For a car?

• Anonymous voted no on July 26, 2008

• Flag

  EZENUF voted no on July 26, 2008

  

  WHEN IT'S YOUR LIFE SAVINGS, YOU HAVE A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE ON WHAT YOU WANT. THIS IS MORE FOR WHEN YOU HIT THE $250,000,000 LOTTERY.

• Anonymous voted yes on July 30, 2008

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on August 6, 2008

  

  hail yhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on August 18, 2008

  

  .

• Anonymous voted no on August 19, 2008

• Flag

  Kevin voted no on August 22, 2008

  

  you only buy these things when your annual disposable income is >$1M

• Anonymous voted no on August 26, 2008

• digger voted yes on August 31, 2008

• Jotoma voted yes on September 2, 2008

• Pookie voted yes on September 14, 2008

• Flag

  Lee_Shepard voted no on September 16, 2008

  

  Save your cash! And buy two different cars!

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on September 18, 2008

  

  NOOOO!!!

• Flag

  BottleGenie voted no on September 25, 2008

  

  not in this economy... better go with a hybrid ;)

• Anonymous voted yes on October 8, 2008

• Flag

  automoblog voted yes on October 15, 2008

  

  If you're like me, then yes. Instead of a house, buy a townhome or something. Just make sure your living quarters has enough space for you and you'll be fine.

• Anonymous voted yes on November 12, 2008

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on November 16, 2008

  

  aston msrtin db9 are the besy car ever

• Anonymous voted no on November 21, 2008

• David Bedingfield voted no on December 5, 2008

• Anonymous voted yes on December 20, 2008

• Anonymous voted no on January 5, 2009

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on January 8, 2009

  

  :F

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on February 7, 2009

  

  I own one as well as a new ferrar430 spider. The aston sounds like a motorcycle gang the ferrari sounds like a motorcycle. The Aston is sexier, the ferrari is like driving a freak show. Women love the Aston, girls love the ferrari.

• Anonymous voted no on February 23, 2009

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on March 12, 2009

  

  Are you nuts?

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on March 18, 2009

  

  I only have $200 in my life savings now so it's definitely worth it.

• Anonymous voted yes on April 12, 2009

• Anonymous voted yes on April 15, 2009

• Anonymous voted no on May 13, 2009

• Anonymous voted yes on May 16, 2009

• Flag

  Anonymous voted no on May 17, 2009

  

  hell no, and it's ugly

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on June 1, 2009

  

  lol...NO!

• Flag

  Anonymous voted yes on June 3, 2009

  

  hi

• Anonymous voted yes on July 24, 2009